Collaboration is at the heart of Re/place, designed by in a research partnership with , the and . Fox’s avant-garde practice situates itself on the blurred boundaries of art installation, engineering and architecture. Its latest project is a temporary structure featuring a striking juxtaposition of high-tech and rudimentary techniques.
The winning design for the increasingly prestigious prioritises the principle of a ‘system of building’ rather than the final structural form. It’s in-keeping with the ethos behind the temporary architecture commission, a format that has been gaining popularity on the back of global events such as the in London and in Melbourne.
At the centre of Fox’s design is materiality – specifically, the of supposedly waste material. This is not a token gesture but forms the very core of the project. Working with in Sydney and in Melbourne, the studio has sourced disused timber that would have otherwise ended up in landfill.
In what is perhaps the best definition of we’ve come across yet, some of the timber was even sourced from the previous Summer Place pavilion by . As Fox explains, the particular pieces of timber are less important than the modulated system as a whole, which can be disassembled and refitted with newly fabricated pieces.
Related:
This move represents a sophisticated step forward in our understanding of sustainability. More than just recycling, this is design drawing on re-use as a fundamental driving force and organising principle.
The focus on materials means that form is less important in this project; rather than ‘form-follows-function,’ it’s more about form adjusting to the life cycle of materials. The static architectural object is superseded in significance by its impermanence, adaptability and the way it’s sourced and assembled.
is actually the familiar part of the project; on the really experimental end is the cutting edge use of mycelium, the root-like structure common to most fungus, to form a partial facade. Philip Gough, biodesign program director at the University of Sydney, describes the process as “casting with a living material.”
The design process has ranged from hand-trimming overgrown fungi to high-tech components such as the fabrication of timber pieces on a CNC (computer numerical control) machine at the University of Sydney’s .
One of the implications of engaging with this kind of biodesign is the need to rethink agency in architecture. Instead of controlling a static object, the designer here is faced with the need to truly understand what a natural material will allow and how to work with it. The nature of growing and changing materials provide, by definition, a finish and form that are partly unpredictable.
This is a challenging way to think about architecture but one that can engage people in new ways. “I hope that visitors to the pavilion will be prompted to really think about materials and where they come from. The aim is to open up discussion about circular economy and the possibilities of re-making,” says Fox.
Temporary pavilion architecture is all about pushing boundaries and thinking in new ways. At Albury’s Summer Place Pavilion, Studio Chris Fox is bringing together concepts of biodesign, impermanence and material re-use in an invitation to rethink the future of design.
Re/place will launch the Albury Summer Place Pavilion on December 8th.
Studio Chris Fox
Summer Place AlburyCity
We think you might also like .
The post appeared first on .
Related Posts
