The recently-republished Quartz article draws from research by Steven Levitt, perhaps best-known for being co-author of the book Freakonomics.
The study asked people who were having a hard time making a decision to participate in a randomized digital coin toss on the website FreakonomicsExperiments.com. People asked questions ranging from “Should I quit my job?” to “Should I break up with my significant other?” and “Should I go back to school?” Heads meant they should take action. Tails, they stuck with the status quo.
Ultimately, 20,000 coins were flipped—and people who got heads and made a big change reported being significantly happier than they were before, both two months and six months later.
Here’s the takeaway, direct from Steven Levitt:
A good rule of thumb in decision making is, whenever you cannot decide what you should do, choose the action that represents a change, rather than continuing the status quo.
Here’s another version of the takeaway, per the article author Sarah Todd:
If the choice is between action and inaction, and you’re genuinely unsure about what to do, choose action.
Again, this should be the tie-breaker. Obviously, if you are completely happy with the status quo, then there is no reason for change.
“The editorial content here is not provided by any of the companies mentioned, and has not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities. Opinions expressed here are the author’s alone. This email may contain links through which we are compensated when you click on or are approved for offers.”
from .
Copyright © 2004-2022 MyMoneyBlog.com. All Rights Reserved. Do not re-syndicate without permission.